Vola Sangiovese 2012

Last time I was waiting to check out at my local Trader Joe’s, they had this Vola strategically positioned right at the end of the line immediately before the cash registers.  Given that I had sampled two other inexpensive Sangiovese wines in recent days, how could I pass this one up?  According to the label it was bottled in Italy and imported by D’Aquino.

Winemaker: Vola
Varietal: Sangiovese
Vintage: 2012
Appellation:  Puglia IGT, Italy
Price: $2.99 at Trader Joe’s

Notes: The color of this budget Italian was a light ruby.  The bouquet brought scents of cherry, earth and mushroom.  Acidity was bright on this light-bodied Sangiovese, and tannins were medium.  Alcohol was at 12%.  On the palate I found wood, cherry, boysenberry and pepper.  Except for the definite sweetness, flavors were very weak in the midpalate.  At the finish the wood returns along with a medicinal note.  While this does present many of the attributes touted as typical for a Sangiovese, I think it’s not a good example of this varietal.  I didn’t hate the wine; price notwithstanding, I just didn’t like it all that well due largely to what I felt was a weak flavor profile.  At $2.99, though, maybe you’ll want to trust your own taste buds over mine and give it a try.

Advertisements

Globerati Sangiovese Rubicone 2012

The Globerati label indicates they are “Wines of the World.”  According to their website, Globerati “stalks the finest vineyards of the world, swooping in at the opportune moment to bring you the latest sensational wine.”  Their products listed include a Gascogne Blanc and Cabernet Sauvignon from France, a Sauvignon Blanc from Chile, a Bonarda from Argentina and this Sangiovese from Italy.  Their parent company is Wine Exchange, Inc. out of Novato, CA.

Interestingly, this is the second inexpensive Sangiovese I’ve found at Whole Foods bottled by the folks at Casa Vinicola Botter. The first was the Gran Conti Sangiovese Rubicone 2012.  Looks like the Botter folks make quite a bit of Sangiovese!

Winemaker:  Globerati
Wine:  Sangiovese Rubicone
Varietal: Sangiovese
Vintage:  2012
Appellation:  Rubicone IGT, Italy
Price:  $6.99 at Whole Foods

Notes:  Another Italian red that was a deep garnet color in the glass.  On the nose I caught aromas of earth, dark fruit, herbs and a hint of oak.  This was light-bodied with a noticeable but gentle viscosity.  Acidity was lively, and the tannins were in the medium range.  Alcohol was at 12%.  On the tongue this was a peppery Sangiovese with plenty of oak, black cherry, a hint of red licorice and notes of green herbs.  The finish was of roughly medium duration with more pepper, the herbs, and a haunting of red licorice.  It was yet another pleasant budget Sangiovese.  I think the peppery nature of this selection helps reduce the perception of sweetness on the palate – something I personally appreciated.  I can imagine this wine would be good accompanying a red sauce pasta, lasagna or maybe a pork chop.

Epicuro Salice Salentino 2011

Taking a chance on a new wine – not to mention a new grape varietal – can be a risky move.  It isn’t something you’d want to do, for instance, when hosting a dinner for your new boss. Under the right circumstances, though, it can be a very rewarding experience.  This time around I grabbed a red blend from Italy with two varietals I didn’t know.  The Epicuro Vendemmia Salice Salentino 2011 is made from 80% Negro Amaro and 20% Malvasia Negra.  For me, the adventure of a new wine experience is a reward in itself made even better when the wine is decent.

Winemaker: Epicuro
Wine: Vendemmia
Varietal: Red Blend
Vintage: 2011
Appellation:  Salice Salentino DOC, Italy
Price:  $5.99 at Trader Joe’s

Notes:  The color of this Italian vino was a dark garnet. The bouquet was a surpising group of aromas – major notes of turpentine and tar with underlying dark berries and hints of green herbs. It was a medium-weight selection with a nice, light viscosity. Acidity was good. Tannins were medium with a quick onset or “grab” (others call it grip). Alcohol was at 13%. I have to admit that the bouquet had me worried a bit. I thought maybe I’d end up tasting mostly turpentine. Happily, that wasn’t the case at all. Flavors were primarily sweet dark cherry drops, dried green herbs, and pinches of salt. The tannins brought a bitter woody flavor after which the long finish echoed cherry drops and saline notes. Overall, it was an interesting glass of wine in the good sense of the word.

Oak Grove Petite Sirah Reserve 2011

I always appreciate it when somebody gives me a recommendation for a wine.  Even if it isn’t always my “cup of tea,” I can’t help but be grateful for another wine enthusiast’s impulse to share.

Those of you who drop in fairly regularly (he says hoping somebody DOES drop in regularly – lol) will know that I had a Petite Sirah over the holidays that I searched for – and found – in a Total Wine near my home town.  Because it’s a big store, I had to ask a very nice staff person for directions to the “Other Reds” section.  She not only took me to the wine I was looking for but said, “Have you had the Oak Grove?  If you haven’t, you should.”  So I did!

Winemaker: Oak Grove
Wine: Petite Sirah Reserve
Varietal: Petite Sirah
Vintage:  2011
Appellation: California
Price: $8.99 at Total Wine

Notes:  In the glass this Oak Grove selection was a very dark garnet   It was so dark that it was nearly opaque.  On the nose I got scents of dark fruit, oak, and lotion (I think lanolin is the appropriate term).  Acidity was fine but maybe just a tad on the low side.  Weight on the tongue was on the lighter side of medium as were the tannins.  Alcohol was at 13%.  Flavors were grounded by a core of black raspberry with light notes of oak and a sweet green herb – let’s call it stevia.  The finish was very long with lingering black raspberry and violets.  It was a fine glass of wine.  Unfortunately, the perception of sweetness took away a little from my personal enjoyment of it.  But that really isn’t too terrible.  It just means I get to keep sampling Petite Sirahs in my search!  Search for what?  Oh, perhaps a Petite Sirah I can call my favorite (until the next vintage is released, anyway).

Trader Joe’s Petit Reserve Mourvèdre 2011

I gotta say, I don’t think I’ve ever had a single varietal Mourvèdre before.  I’ve had it any number of times as part of a red blend, but I can’t recall having tasted it seul, as it were.  That’s French for “alone.”  Sorry, I was just feeling the French for a second there.  Perhaps the wine gave me some Frenchspiration.  Oh!  I apologize.  I seem to be in a goofy mood.  Regathering my wits now ….

I realize that this grape is used in single varietals by several U.S. producers, including Cline, Bonny Doon, Tablas Creek, etc.  So it’s not like it would have been impossible to find one.  Until now I just wasn’t Mourvèdred to.  [Ugh!  That was really bad.  LOL]  Anyway, the good news for me was that Paso Robles is pretty much the hot spot in the U.S. for the production of good Mourvèdre wines.  Evidently, the climate and the soil are as good as anywhere for this particular varietal.  Knowing that certainly got my hopes up as I popped the cork on this typically budget-friendly TJ offering!

Winemaker: Trader Joe’s (bottled by Central Coast Wine Warehouse)
Wine: Petit Reserve Mourvèdre Paso Robles
Varietal: Mourvèdre
Vintage: 2011
Appellation:  Paso Robles, CA
Price:  $7.99 at Trader Joe’s

Notes:  The wine was garnet-colored and had a big bouquet of barnyard (sous-bois?), plum, young blueberries and violets.  The body of this red from Paso Robles was quite light.  Acidity was nice and brisk, and the tannins were light on the palate.  I caught flavors of young blueberries (ripe but just, if you know what I mean), cherry, plenty of pepper and oak.  Alcohol was at 13%.  First, let me say that I really enjoyed the smell of this wine.  It was a pleasure to breathe in the fragrant earthy and fruity scents.  I won’t go so far as to say that I didn’t even need to drink it after having sniffed it’s heady aromas.  No, I definitely bought the bottle to be drunk.  So, as far as flavor was concerned, I would put this one solidly in the good category.  It wasn’t a revelation, but it was pretty darned enjoyable.

Gran Conti Sangiovese Rubicone 2012

As I have mentioned before, I am always interested in knowing who made the wine I’m drinking.  Sometimes it’s a fairly straightforward situation.  Other times it’s hard to suss out – labels notwithstanding – without a little help.  In this case the label only had an official vintner number to identify the winemaker.  That could mean the wine was made as a private label selection – perhaps for Whole Foods or maybe for the importer.  Doing a little poking around and connecting the dots, it looks to me as though this Gran Conti Sangiovese comes from the Italian vintner La Casada which also bottles/has bottled a Sangiovese Rubicone under it’s own label.  According to simplywinesdirect.com, “La Casada is a part of the Casa Vinicola Botter, established by Carlo Botter in 1928 in Fossalta di Piave, north-east of Venice.  …  The company is now run by Carlo Botter’s grandchildren, and has established a remarkable reputation for the quality of its wines.”  Interestingly, neither Gran Conti nor La Casada are listed on the Casa Vinicola Botter website among their products.

Winemaker: Gran Conti
Wine: Sangiovese Rubicone
Varietal: Sangiovese
Vintage: 2012
Appellation:  Rubicone IGT, Italy
Price: $9.99 at Whole Foods

Notes: The color of this Sangiovese was a nice ruby in the glass.  On the bouquet I smelled sweet berries and musty earth with hints of spice.  Characteristically light-bodied, this Gran Conti red was at 12% alcohol with good acidity.  Flavors for me were sweet currant and cherry at the fore, developing stewed plum as the wine breathed.  There were also notes of black tea and oak with a good dash of pepper near the finish.  Tannins made a very subtle showing.  Overall, although fairly sweet (right at the minimum alcohol content requirement for a Chianti Classico) and lacking some structure, I thought it was a pretty decent glass of Sangiovese.

Monthly Wine Writing Challenge #6 (Mystery)–Time to Vote!

Wow! For this, it’s 6th iteration, the drunken cyclist has managed to encourage some 25 folks to write posts for the Monthly Wine Writing Challenge. Fantastic!! If you haven’t yet, use the links provided and read the posts. Then take another minute and choose your top 3 using the poll form. You don’t have to be a wine blogger to vote! Kudos and many thanks to the drunken cyclist for all his hard work.

the drunken cyclist

MysteryWell, the time for submissions is now over, and I have to say I am thrilled with the number and quality of entries this time around! The previous “record” number of entries was 15 and this month we had 25 (a 67% increase). Now comes the hard part–choosing the top post. Here are links to all of the posts submitted (in order of submission), and they also can be found over at the “official” website of the challenge: www.mwwcblog.wordpress.com

Please let me know if your post is not listed–I Googled MWWC6 every night to make sure I was not missing any, so hopefully each post is below!

Wine Ramblings        An Edible Quest          Confessions of a Wine Geek

Michael’s Wine       Oenophilogical        renenutet13       Wayward Wine

foodwineclick        Julia Bailey        sweetempranillo        Duff’s Wine

My Custard…

View original post 223 more words